Skip to content
Hire engineers

Hire iOS developers

Native iOS costs more than cross-platform and is sometimes worth it anyway. The question is not which is better in general, but whether what makes your product good lives close enough to the platform to justify a codebase that only runs on one of them.

When native earns its cost

Native is the right answer when the product depends on the platform: sustained background work, deep hardware access, tight integration with system frameworks, or interface behaviour that has to feel exactly like the operating system rather than approximately like it.

When the app is mostly screens over an API, cross-platform delivers the same product for less. We would rather tell you that than sell two native builds.

iPad is not a large iPhone

iPad has its own interface expectations — multi-column layouts, multitasking, external keyboard and pointer support — and treating it as a scaled phone build produces an app that works but feels wrong on the device.

We have built iPad applications as first-class targets rather than afterthoughts, which is unusual enough to be worth stating plainly.

Suited to
  • Products where iOS is the primary or only platform

  • Apps depending on hardware, background processing or system frameworks

  • iPad-first products where the large screen is the point

Not the right fit
  • Products needing both platforms where functionality is largely shared — React Native costs less for the same result

  • A first release testing demand, where two native codebases is a large bet before any evidence

Proof

5 projects built with it

Drawn from the technology each project actually used, so this list cannot include work that did not.

All case studies
RealVision case study

Financial Media and Investment Education

RealVision

A cross-platform financial streaming service delivering expert analysis across web, mobile, iPad and TV.

40%
Increase in user engagement through dynamic tools and content
200,000+
Engaged members globally
4.5
Average user satisfaction rating
ActivityHub case study

EdTech and Activity Management

ActivityHub

A SaaS platform connecting parents with children's activity providers across web, mobile and iPad.

94 min/week
Time saved for activity providers managing activities
863K
Messages sent between users
39K
Sessions hosted on the platform
Global Macro Investor case study

Financial Services, Investment Research and Market Analysis

Global Macro Investor

A subscription research platform delivering macroeconomic analysis to investors and financial professionals.

4.8
Average subscriber satisfaction rating
15,000+
Reports accessed by subscribers monthly
65%
Engagement rate in live webinars and discussions
SPARE case study

Fintech

SPARE

A fintech network turning retail points of sale into cash access points, built end to end.

E-Med case study

Healthcare — Hospital Operations

E-Med

A hospital management platform, web and mobile, covering OPD to admissions, digital prescriptions and billing.

What drives cost

We do not publish rates, because scope decides them

A figure quoted before scope is understood is not a commitment either side can rely on. These are the things that actually move it.

iPhone, iPad or both

Supporting both properly is more than one build plus a layout pass.

Hardware and system integration

Camera, background processing and system frameworks each add real work.

OS version support

How far back you support widens testing and constrains available APIs.

Store review

Submission and review are timeline items, not paperwork.

Working together

NDA first, contract on frozen scope

We sign a mutual NDA before the first detailed conversation, not after — you should be able to describe what you are building without qualifying it.

The contract follows requirement freeze rather than preceding it. Once scope is agreed and written down, it is what the agreement is drawn against, which is what makes a fixed commitment meaningful in the first place.

Questions

What buyers usually ask

Something not covered here?

Ask directly — we would rather answer a specific question than publish a general one.

Contact us
  • 01

    Swift or Objective-C?

    Swift for new work. We can work in an existing Objective-C codebase where one exists.
  • 02

    Do you build iPad apps?

    Yes, as first-class targets with their own interface design rather than a stretched phone layout.
  • 03

    Native or React Native?

    Native when the product depends on the platform; cross-platform when it is mostly screens over an API. The answer depends on your product, and we will give it straight.
  • 04

    Do you handle App Store submission?

    Yes, including signing, review and release.
  • 05

    Can you work on our existing app?

    Yes, starting with a read of the codebase and an honest note on its state.
Next step

Tell us what you're building

Describe the app and what it needs from the device. We will tell you whether native is worth it for your case.

  • NDA before we talk
  • Reply within one business day
  • No obligation