Skip to content
Technology

Node.js development

Node.js earns its place when a service spends its time waiting — on a database, a payment provider, another API. It earns it much less when the work is CPU-bound, and knowing which of the two you have is the decision that matters.

Where the event loop pays, and where it does not

A single Node process handles a large number of concurrent connections cheaply because most of what an API does is wait. That is the right shape for request routing, integration work, and anything that fans out to several downstream services.

It is the wrong shape for sustained computation. A CPU-heavy operation on the main thread blocks every other request behind it, and the symptom — latency that climbs under load with no obvious slow query — is easy to misread. Where we hit genuinely heavy computation we move it off the request path rather than scaling the process count and hoping.

What we build with it

API and service layers behind web and mobile clients, integration work against payment, messaging and identity providers, and the data access layer over PostgreSQL or MongoDB.

It is the most-used technology in our portfolio by a wide margin — the service layer under both the largest platforms we have built and the smallest.

Suited to
  • API and service layers for web and mobile products

  • Integration-heavy systems talking to several third-party providers

  • Teams already writing TypeScript on the frontend who want one language across the stack

Not the right fit
  • Sustained CPU-bound work — a different runtime will serve you better, and we would say so

  • Teams with deep existing expertise in another backend stack and no reason to move

Proof

11 projects built with it

Drawn from the technology each project actually used, so this list cannot include work that did not.

All case studies
RealVision case study

Financial Media and Investment Education

RealVision

A cross-platform financial streaming service delivering expert analysis across web, mobile, iPad and TV.

40%
Increase in user engagement through dynamic tools and content
200,000+
Engaged members globally
4.5
Average user satisfaction rating
ActivityHub case study

EdTech and Activity Management

ActivityHub

A SaaS platform connecting parents with children's activity providers across web, mobile and iPad.

94 min/week
Time saved for activity providers managing activities
863K
Messages sent between users
39K
Sessions hosted on the platform
Global Macro Investor case study

Financial Services, Investment Research and Market Analysis

Global Macro Investor

A subscription research platform delivering macroeconomic analysis to investors and financial professionals.

4.8
Average subscriber satisfaction rating
15,000+
Reports accessed by subscribers monthly
65%
Engagement rate in live webinars and discussions
SPARE case study

Fintech

SPARE

A fintech network turning retail points of sale into cash access points, built end to end.

Everdays case study

Insurance & Financial Services

Everdays

A digital life insurance platform and iOS planning app, rated 4.6 across 991 App Store reviews.

4.6
App Store rating across 991 reviews
~90%
Of applicants qualify, often within minutes
$200B
In total assets backing policies across partner carriers
Fourth Partner Energy case study

Renewable Energy

Fourth Partner Energy

Web, Android and the data-crunching backend behind a distributed solar portfolio spanning 3,000+ projects.

What drives cost

We do not publish rates, because scope decides them

A figure quoted before scope is understood is not a commitment either side can rely on. These are the things that actually move it.

Integration count

Each external provider adds implementation, error handling and a failure mode to design for.

Data model complexity

How much of the work is transactional and has to reconcile.

Existing system

Building alongside a system already in production costs more than starting clean.

Working together

NDA first, contract on frozen scope

We sign a mutual NDA before the first detailed conversation, not after — you should be able to describe what you are building without qualifying it.

The contract follows requirement freeze rather than preceding it. Once scope is agreed and written down, it is what the agreement is drawn against, which is what makes a fixed commitment meaningful in the first place.

Questions

What buyers usually ask

Something not covered here?

Ask directly — we would rather answer a specific question than publish a general one.

Contact us
  • 01

    Node.js or a different backend?

    Node suits IO-bound service work, which is most API and integration work. If your load is computational we will tell you before the build rather than after.
  • 02

    Which databases do you pair with it?

    PostgreSQL and MongoDB most often, and Supabase on more recent projects.
  • 03

    Can you work on an existing Node codebase?

    Yes. That usually starts with a read of what is there and an honest note on what should be left alone.
  • 04

    Do you write TypeScript?

    Yes, and we prefer it on anything with a lifespan measured in years.
  • 05

    Who owns the code?

    You do, from the first commit.
Next step

Tell us what the service has to do

Describe the load, the integrations and what it has to talk to. We will come back with an architecture opinion and a first milestone.

  • NDA before we talk
  • Reply within one business day
  • No obligation