Hire React developers
Almost any team can build a React screen. The difficulty arrives in year two, when state is spread across a dozen contexts, nobody is sure which component owns what, and a small change breaks something three screens away.
State is where React codebases age
The framework has almost no opinion about where state lives, which is why it scales to any size of team and why large codebases drift. Server state, form state, UI state and derived state have genuinely different lifecycles, and treating them as one thing is what produces the tangle.
The practical discipline is deciding what a component owns before writing it, and keeping the distinction between what the server knows and what the screen is currently doing. Most of the pain attributed to React is really an unclear answer to that question.
Component boundaries and the design system
A component library only pays off if the boundaries match how the product actually changes. Splitting by visual similarity produces components that need a new prop for every screen; splitting by role produces ones that survive a redesign.
We have taken interfaces through exactly that transition — ActivityHub moved from AngularJS to React, which is a rebuild of the component model as much as a change of framework.
Product interfaces with a multi-year life ahead of them
Teams whose React codebase has become slow to change
Companies adding frontend capacity to an existing engineering team
A largely static marketing site, where React is more machinery than the job needs
Teams wanting a rewrite for its own sake — we would rather fix the state model than restart
7 projects built with it
Drawn from the technology each project actually used, so this list cannot include work that did not.
Financial Media and Investment Education
RealVision
A cross-platform financial streaming service delivering expert analysis across web, mobile, iPad and TV.
- 40%
- Increase in user engagement through dynamic tools and content
- 200,000+
- Engaged members globally
- 4.5
- Average user satisfaction rating
EdTech and Activity Management
ActivityHub
A SaaS platform connecting parents with children's activity providers across web, mobile and iPad.
- 94 min/week
- Time saved for activity providers managing activities
- 863K
- Messages sent between users
- 39K
- Sessions hosted on the platform
Trading
OptionTeller
An options analytics platform querying 70+ million daily trades, built on Next.js and Rust.
Food Delivery
TocoPick
A full food delivery platform — customer app, rider app and vendor dashboard — built in house.
Healthcare — Fertility
Gunjan IVF World
A patient companion web app for an IVF clinic group — assessment, journey tracking and consultation booking.
Healthcare — Hospital Operations
E-Med
A hospital management platform, web and mobile, covering OPD to admissions, digital prescriptions and billing.
We do not publish rates, because scope decides them
A figure quoted before scope is understood is not a commitment either side can rely on. These are the things that actually move it.
Interface surface
Screen count and how much genuine variation sits between them.
State complexity
Real-time and collaborative interfaces cost more than request-response ones.
Existing codebase
Working inside an established codebase means reading before writing.
Design maturity
An existing component library shortens the work considerably.
NDA first, contract on frozen scope
We sign a mutual NDA before the first detailed conversation, not after — you should be able to describe what you are building without qualifying it.
The contract follows requirement freeze rather than preceding it. Once scope is agreed and written down, it is what the agreement is drawn against, which is what makes a fixed commitment meaningful in the first place.
What buyers usually ask
Something not covered here?
Ask directly — we would rather answer a specific question than publish a general one.
Contact us01
React or Next.js?
Next.js if the product has public pages that must render fast and rank; plain React if it sits entirely behind a login. The rendering decision is covered on the Next.js page.02
Can your engineers work in our repository?
Yes — in your repo, your review process and your cadence. That is the usual arrangement.03
Do you write tests?
Yes, weighted toward the behaviour that breaks in production rather than a coverage figure.04
Can you take over an existing React codebase?
Yes. We start with a read and an honest assessment, including where the right answer is to leave something alone.05
How quickly can engineers start?
Faster than hiring, and the ramp-up is real rather than notional — we would rather set that expectation accurately.
Tell us what you're building
Describe the interface and where your team runs short. We will propose a team shape and a realistic ramp-up.
- NDA before we talk
- Reply within one business day
- No obligation