Skip to content
Hire engineers

Hire React Native developers

React Native shares most of a codebase across iOS and Android, which is a genuine saving. What it does not share is everything that touches the platform — and knowing where that line falls is the difference between a saving and a slow rewrite.

Where cross-platform stops paying

Screens, navigation and business logic share well. Anything touching hardware or platform services — background processing, push notification behaviour, deep camera or Bluetooth work, platform-specific permissions — needs native code on both sides, written twice, in two languages.

The failure mode is a project that assumed one codebase, then discovered a third of it has to be native anyway. That is a scoping question, and it is answerable at the start rather than discovered in month four.

There is a third option, and sometimes it wins

Where an application is mostly a web product already, wrapping it — with Capacitor or similar — delivers store presence and device APIs without a second codebase at all. It gives up native feel in exchange for one thing to maintain, which is the right trade more often than the cross-platform debate usually admits.

RealVision has been through all three: native iOS and Android to begin with, React Native as the surface area grew, and now a Capacitor wrapper around the web application. That progression was driven by what the product needed at each stage rather than by a framework preference — and it is why we treat this as a decision to revisit rather than settle once.

Whichever route you take, app review, signing and staged rollout are engineering work with their own timelines, and they do not compress.

Suited to
  • Products needing iOS and Android where most functionality is shared

  • Teams with React experience who want to reuse it on mobile

  • Companies funding one mobile team rather than two

Not the right fit
  • Apps whose value is in heavy device or hardware integration — go native, and we will say so

  • A single-platform product where cross-platform buys nothing but indirection

Proof

3 projects built with it

Drawn from the technology each project actually used, so this list cannot include work that did not.

All case studies
RealVision case study

Financial Media and Investment Education

RealVision

A cross-platform financial streaming service delivering expert analysis across web, mobile, iPad and TV.

40%
Increase in user engagement through dynamic tools and content
200,000+
Engaged members globally
4.5
Average user satisfaction rating
TocoPick case study

Food Delivery

TocoPick

A full food delivery platform — customer app, rider app and vendor dashboard — built in house.

Impactall case study

EdTech — 3D & VR Simulations

Impactall

The backend, admin dashboard and initial web and mobile app behind Impactall's Be Curious learning platform.

What drives cost

We do not publish rates, because scope decides them

A figure quoted before scope is understood is not a commitment either side can rely on. These are the things that actually move it.

Native surface

How much has to be written twice in platform code. The main cost driver.

Device support

Older devices and OS versions widen testing considerably.

Store requirements

Review, signing and release cycles are real timeline items.

Offline behaviour

Working offline and reconciling later is significantly more work than it appears.

Working together

NDA first, contract on frozen scope

We sign a mutual NDA before the first detailed conversation, not after — you should be able to describe what you are building without qualifying it.

The contract follows requirement freeze rather than preceding it. Once scope is agreed and written down, it is what the agreement is drawn against, which is what makes a fixed commitment meaningful in the first place.

Questions

What buyers usually ask

Something not covered here?

Ask directly — we would rather answer a specific question than publish a general one.

Contact us
  • 01

    React Native or native?

    Native when the product's value is in device integration or platform-specific behaviour. React Native when most of it is screens and logic. We will give you the honest answer for your case, including when it costs us the larger project.
  • 02

    Can you add React Native to an existing native app?

    Yes, incrementally. Whether it is worthwhile depends on how much of the remaining roadmap is shared.
  • 03

    Do you handle store submission?

    Yes, including signing, review and staged rollout.
  • 04

    What about performance?

    Fine for the large majority of products. Where a specific screen needs native performance, that screen goes native rather than the whole app.
  • 05

    Who owns the code?

    You do, from the first commit.
Next step

Tell us what you're building

Describe the app and what it has to do on the device. We will tell you honestly whether cross-platform is the right call.

  • NDA before we talk
  • Reply within one business day
  • No obligation